BOOK
THE SPOOKS
By
Maj Gen V.K. Singh
The
terror strike in Mumbai has highlighted, once again, the utter incompetence of
our intelligence agencies. The audacity and scale of the attack has shocked the
whole World. For three days, a dozen odd men held the country to ransom,
bringing to a halt normal life in the city that prides itself on its
resilience. Perhaps for the first time, fingers have begun to be pointed not at
the netas and babus but the spooks. Why are our intelligence agencies so inept?
Do we deserve such a bunch of bumbling buffoons, who behave like reincarnations
of James Bond but remind us of Gopichand Jasoos? How many more lives must we
lose before calling them to account?
As
pointed out recently by a former Naval Chief, Admiral Arun Prakash, the basic
problem in our country lies in understanding the meaning of security. Even a
child knows that the most essential element of a nation’s security is its
military prowess. But after 1947, the military has been excluded from the
security mechanism, becoming an adjunct of the Ministry of Defence, which is
controlled by bureaucrats who have absolutely no clue of the subject. With
time, it is the babu and the spook
who has taken over the job which rightly belongs to the soldier. This brought
the country to grief in 1962, when BN Mullik, the Director IB, was siting
border posts instead of the military commanders. One would think that after a
debacle of that magnitude, the lesson would have been learned. Predictably, the
Henderson-Brookes report which pointed out these anomalies was locked up in
some obscure cupboard in the Ministry of Defence, and the matter was never
discussed in Parliament.
After
the creation of RAW in 1968, the situation has only exacerbated, with intelligence
agencies literally taking over the business of security, convincing politicians
that the two are synonymous. In an article in the Mail Today on 28 November
2008 an ex Chief of RAW pontificated: “intelligence
agencies are the best instruments with a nation (not the government) in the
furtherance of its foreign security interests and the protection of the
country”. With these super spies to protect us, we might as well disband
the armed forces! Such drivel is systematically fed to the political leadership
and the public, who start believing what would be considered bizarre anywhere
else in the World. Is it any wonder that national security is in the hands of
an ex-spook?
India
is the largest democracy in the World and her citizens enjoy freedoms available
in few societies, even in developed countries. However, these rights and
freedoms are now under threat, not from outside, but from within. Slowly but
surely, intelligence agencies are making their presence felt in Indian polity.
Their growing clout in governance is becoming a threat not only to the nation’s
democratic credentials but also the life of the populace. Unless this new form
of terrorism is recognised and nipped, there is grave danger of it causing
irreparable damage to our way of life, achieved at great cost.
In 2001 the Group of Ministers on National Security – it
was headed by LK Advani, with Jaswant Singh, George Fernandes, and Yashwant
Sinha as members - submitted its report to the Government. The Report was
released on 23 May 2001, though articles containing the gist of its contents
and its tabling in Parliament had been appearing in the media from February
onwards. When it was made public, it was found that the entire chapter on
Intelligence (pages 16 to 40) had been deleted. The Home Minister stated that this had been done at the behest of the
intelligence agencies. Strangely enough, the PIB release of 23 May 2001
gave out the salient recommendations, including those pertaining to the deleted
chapter on dealing with intelligence. These were also covered by several
newspapers during the next few days, which quoted from the Report. In August
2001, another news report quoted Shri LK Advani saying that the report would be
discussed in Parliament. However, in response to an RTI application, both
Houses of Parliament have confirmed that the GOM Report was never tabled in
Parliament and there was no debate. Obviously, like the deletions, the
withdrawal of the report from Parliament was also a last minute decision. Did
the intelligence agencies have a hand in this too?
The ‘sanitized’ version of the 137
page Report is available on the web site of the Ministry of Defence. The four major divisions of the report
are Internal Security; Intelligence Apparatus; Border Management; and
Management of Defence. The entire chapter on Intelligence has been deleted.
However, there is only one minor deletion in the chapter on Internal Security,
dealing with archaic laws and one minor deletion in the Chapter on Defence
Management dealing with Military Civil Interface. The Official Secrets Act 1923
makes it amply clear that Defence matters are considered more sensitive than
others. Is it not strange that the entire chapter on Intelligence has been
deleted from the GOM Report, while there is almost no deletion in the chapter
on Defence?
The Right to Information Act, 2005 has brought in a new
era of transparency in the government. There is little doubt that this is
perhaps the most empowering piece of legislation in recent times. However, once
again the ubiquitous hand of the spooks is visible. The Second Schedule lists
18 intelligence and security agencies to which the provisions of the Act do not
apply. Apart from RAW and IB, it also has all the para military forces and some
police establishments. Once again, the
defence forces are not in the list. According to Section 8 of the Act, any
government department can refuse information that is likely affect national
security. Then what is the justification for a separate list for the
intelligence and security agencies? Clearly, it is to keep their misdeeds
hidden from public view and to reiterate their self proclaimed status as
‘secret’ agencies. The law makers who lent their voice to the Act did not
realise its far reaching the implications. Today, a soldier, sailor or airman
can ask for information concerning his salary, accommodation, promotion
prospects etc. However, this privilege is denied to a man serving in the BSF,
ITBP, CISF and Assam Rifles. If this is not grave injustice and discrimination,
then what is?
In June 2006 the second Administrative Reforms
Commission chaired by Shri Veerappa Moily submitted its first report on ‘Right
to Information – Master key to good governance’ to the Government. One of the key recommendations was that the Official Secrets Act, 1923 should be
repealed, and suitable safeguards to protect the security of State should be
incorporated in the National Security Act. In response to an RTI application, the Ministry of Home Affairs has
stated that “The Government has constituted a Committee of Secretaries
to examine the recommendations made by the 2nd Administrative
Reforms Commission. The Committee did
not accept the recommendations made by the Commission in view of the submission
made by the Ministry of Home Affairs”. It does not require much imagination to
guess who is behind the submission of the MHA.
Significantly, the decision not to accept the recommendations of the ARC
was taken by bureaucrats, not the Cabinet or the PM.
This is not all. When asked to provide information about
the deliberations of the Committee of Secretaries, the Home Ministry refused,
on the specious ground that since officers from certain organisations that were
exempted also attended these meetings, the record of its deliberations could
not be provided. In other words, any department that wishes to keeps its
deliberations secret has to simply invite a representative from RAW, IB, NSG or
BSF, even if the agenda is arrangements for a Diwali Mela or a musical concert!
Brilliant, is it not? Surely, Parliament did not visualise such contingencies
when it agreed to exempt these organisations from the Right to Information Act.
The
most recent example of ‘intelligence terrorism’ is the ban on writing books and
articles about intelligence agencies by retired personnel. The Gazette of India
of 31 March 2008 contains a memorandum requiring all officers serving in
intelligence and security agencies to give an undertaking that they will not
publish any book or article that is likely to damage National Security after
they retire from service, or their pensions will be stopped. Why not ask every
citizen to give an undertaking that he will not commit theft, or murder? Are
there not laws to punish them if they do? The OSA can be used to haul up those
who reveal state secrets, undertaking or no undertaking. Then why make another
rule, which is clearly unconstitutional?
Clearly,
it is the intelligence chiefs who call the shots today in South and North
Block. The Ministers and Secretaries are either too preoccupied with other
matters or feel it prudent to leave such ‘sensitive’ issues to experts, so that
their backs are covered in case things go wrong. With
increase in terrorism, nobody wants to risk disregarding the advice of
intelligence czars, who are not accountable to anyone. The heavy veil of secrecy
that covers our intelligence agencies hides little else than their
shortcomings. In spite of the astronomical sums spent on them, they have
utterly failed to provide information about a single terrorist attack in recent
years. Yet, no one has been sacked. They are not subject to parliamentary
oversight or financial audit. Is it any wonder that they have become a law unto
themselves? They are the only public institution which is not accountable to
the public, through Parliament. Their sins remain hidden due to the mantle of
secrecy that they have deliberately covered themselves with.
An
intelligence failure of the magnitude of the Mumbai attacks would have resulted
in instant sacking of the persons responsible. In the eighties, an American
teenager landed a small airplane on the Red Square in Moscow. The Defence
Minster and the C-in-C responsible for air defence lost their jobs. In 1962,
India suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Chinese. Again, the
Defence Minister as well as the Army Chief had to resign. It is high time the people who pay their salaries – the
Indian tax payer – held them accountable and booked the spooks.
29 Sep 2008
No comments:
Post a Comment